Welfare lower bounds and strategy-proofness in the queueing problem
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigate the implications of welfare lower bounds together with queue-effi ciency and strategyproofness in the context of the queueing problem. As a consequence, we provide alternative characterizations of the k-pivotal mechanisms (Mitra and Mutuswami [13]). First, we introduce the k-welfare lower bound, which ensures that no agent is worse off than the case where she is assigned to the kth position in the queue without any monetary transfer. For each k, we show that the k-pivotal mechanisms generate the minimal budget deficit in each queueing problem among all mechanisms satisfying queue-effi ciency, strategyproofness and the k-welfare lower bound. Next, we consider a well-known welfare lower bound, the identical preferences lower bound and show that when there are odd number of agents, the k-pivotal mechanisms with k = n+1 2 generate the minimal budget deficit in each queueing problem among all mechanisms satisfying queue-effi ciency, strategyproofness and the identical preferences lower bound. JEL Classification: C72, D63, D71, D82.
منابع مشابه
Strategy-proof and anonymous rule in queueing problems: a relationship between equity and efficiency
In this paper, we consider a relationship between equity and efficiency in queueing problems. We show that under strategy-proofness, anonymity in welfare implies queue-efficiency. Furthermore, we also give a characterization of the equally distributed pairwise pivotal rule, as the only rule that satisfies strategy-proofness, anonymity in welfare and budget-balance. keywords: Queueing Problems, ...
متن کاملImpossibilities for probabilistic assignment
We consider the problem of assigning objects probabilistically among a group of agents who may have multi-unit demands. Each agent has linear preferences over the (set of) objects. The most commonly used extension of preferences to compare probabilistic assignments is by means of stochastic dominance, which leads to corresponding notions of envy-freeness, efficiency, and strategy-proofness. We ...
متن کاملWeak group strategy-proof and queue-efficient mechanisms for the queueing problem with multiple machines
We first provide the complete characterization of mechanisms that satisfy weak group strategy-proofness and queue-efficiency in the multiple machine queueing problem with two agents. For any such mechanism, there can be at most one point of discontinuity in the transfer map. We then state a necessary condition for mechanisms to satisfy queue-efficiency, weak group strategy-proofness and continu...
متن کاملA decomposition of strategy-proofness
Strategy-proofness has been one of the central axioms in the theory of social choice. We find that strategy-proofness is decomposed into three axioms: top-restricted AM-proofness, weak monotonicity, and individual bounded response. Among them, individual bounded respose is not as defensible as the other two, and we present possibility results by excluding individual bounded response from strate...
متن کاملSome Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 102 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017